Finding Good Exploratory Essay Topics

Finding Good Exploratory Essay TopicsWhat can you do with a good exploratory essay topic for a high school senior? I'm talking about ideas and concepts that are not so familiar but could be useful for students.Good exploratory essay topics are not usually available from the students' school library. They usually come from a college professor. But you can find them on the Internet or in your local paper.It can be tempting to look for essays in your student's home library, because they may be more complete and may have more specific information. But there is a big difference between a high school senior's home library and a college student's home library. Most of the college students have their own library and it is usually filled with students' books and not of interest to the writer of an essay.In my experience, writing an essay is like going for a walk, where you will want to stay alert and not just stop and catch some fleeting glimpse of some new ideas that you've been eyeing. You don't want to be merely nibbling away at the ideas without being much of a writer, but rather have some ideas and then moving on to the next idea, and then the next idea, and on.Good exploratory essay topics, if found, will give you some ideas of what to write and how to write it, so that you will be able to move on to the next idea. So you will have one idea only, instead of having several thoughts running around in your head.I can sometimes sit in a classroom with a bunch of students who have a lot of word ideas and ask each of them for something that they think might work as an essay topic. Some will immediately get up and ask for a topic and some will actually come up with a good idea.A couple of good exploratory essay topics will help a lot in getting students ready for college. And you can use them for both or just one of your essays. Just remember that it can be hard to grab good ideas for your essays so make sure that you do your homework and that you find those good topics before heading off to class.

How to Conjugate Coûter (to Cost)

Compare and Contrast of Quindlen and Lutz - 800 Words

Compare and Contrast of Quindlen and Lutz Upon reading and examining two essays, â€Å"Life under the chief doublespeak officer† a narrative by William Lutz and â€Å"Homeless†, a descriptive by Anna Quindlen, I firmly believe that Quindlen provides the preferred essay due to the gravity of her subject, greater personal relevance, and that her material allows the reader to sympathize with the subject matter. William Lutz’s essay addresses the growing trend in Corporate America to disguise actions with words and or phrases that mask the intention of the company. In Lutz’s essay he says,† With doublespeak, banks dont have bad loans or bad debts; they have nonperforming assets or nonperforming credits which are rolled over or†¦show more content†¦Inside were curtains, a couch, a stove, and potholders. You are where you live. She was somebody.† (Quindlen, n.d.) Immediately, as a reader, I felt the emotional weight and connected to Quind len and her homeless friend Ann. Quindlen’s description of the photograph allowed me feel as if I had lost something, even though there was no physical connection. Lutz addresses a topic that has spread like an uncontrollable virus fueled by political correctness. However, I question the social relevance of the topic. Lutz’s essay comes off as having a chip on his shoulder and cold disdain for current trends in corporate communication. Lutz’s thoughts, accurate as they are, are nothing more than a rehashed Andy Rooney editorial. Quindlen however, delicately reminds us of how important a place to call â€Å"home† is. Quindlen eloquently says, â€Å"Home is where the heart is. Theres no place like it. I love my home with ferocity totally out of proportion to its appearance or location. I love dumb things about it: the hot-water heater, the plastic rack you drain dishes in, the roof over my head, which occasionally leaks. And yet it is precisely thos e dumb things that make it what it is--a place of certainty, stability, predictability, privacy, for me and for my family. It is where I live. What more can you say about a place than that? That is everything.† (Quindlen, n.d.) This is how Quindlen separates her work from Lutz’s work; by making her

Kants Philosophy Essay Example For Students

Kants Philosophy Essay The keystone of Kants philosophy, sometimes called critical philosophy, is contained in his Critique of Pure Reason (1781), in which he examined the bases of human knowledge and created an individual epistemology. Like earlier philosophers, Kant differentiated modes of thinking into analytic and synthetic propositions. An analytic proposition is one in which the predicate is contained in the subject, as in the statement Black houses are houses. The truth of this type of proposition is evident, because to state the reverse would be to make the proposition self-contradictory. Such propositions are called analytic because truth is discovered by the analysis of the concept itself. Synthetic propositions, on the other hand, are those that cannot be arrived at by pure analysis, as in the statement The house is black. All the common propositions that result from experience of the world are synthetic. Propositions, according to Kant, can also be divided into two other types: empirical and a priori. Empirical propositions depend entirely on sense perception, but a priori propositions have a fundamental validity and are not based on such perception. The difference between these two types of proposition may be illustrated by the empirical The house is black and the a priori Two plus two makes four. Kants thesis in the Critique is that it is possible to make synthetic a priori judgments. This philosophical position is usually known as transcendentalism. In describing how this type of judgment is possible Kant regarded the objects of the material world as fundamentally unknowable; from the point of view of reason, they serve merely as the raw material from which sensations are formed. Objects of themselves have no existence, and space and time exist only as part of the mind, as intuitions by which perceptions are measured and judged. In addition to these intuitions, Kant stated that a number of a priori concepts, which he called categories, also exist. He divided the categories into four groups: those concerning quantity, which are unity, plurality, and totality; those concerning quality, which are reality, negation, and limitation; those concerning relation, which are substance-and-accident, cause-and-effect, and reciprocity; and those concerning modality, which are possibility, existence, and necessity. The intuitions and the categories can be applied to make judgments about experiences and perceptions, but cannot, according to Kant, be applied to abstract ideas such as freedom and existence without leading to inconsistencies in the form of pairs of contradictory propositions, or antinomies, in which both members of each pair can be proved true. In the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) Kant described his ethical system, which is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for expediency or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two types of commands given by reason: the hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end; and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is a three-pronged statement that succinctly outlines Kants moral views. All three must be met for an action to be morally obligatory. Formulation One-Act according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Or, Think about what would happen if everyone acted in the same way, and for the same reasons you did.All moral laws must be universal. They are formed regardless of circumstance, since the circumstances cannot be predicted. All we can really know is the principle behind our action. Besides this, the consequences do not matter. If something is deemed to be moral, it becomes a duty. A duty must be fulfilled, no matter what the consequences. For example, making a false promise, a man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows that he cannot repay, but promises to do so anyway. His maxim is when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow money and promise to repay it, though I know I cannot. If it were universalized, this law of false promises destroys the entire concept of promises, since no person would believe anyone. It is thus immoral, si nce it cannot rationally be universalized. Formulation Two-Act so that you treat humanity, whether in you own person, or that of another, as an end and never as a means only. Or, Dont use people.Humans all possess rationality, this gives them inherent worth. All humans must be treated as ends in every circumstance. This formulation says that the ends of others, if morally permissible, set limits to the ends that we can pursue. We must respect the permissible ends of others, and we may make people serve our purposes only when they, as moral agents, consent to such use. For example, a worker is used as a means to the economic strength of his employer, but he agrees to his use, is paid, and is treated with respect, so he is also an end in and of himself. .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .postImageUrl , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:hover , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:visited , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:active { border:0!important; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:active , .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u3c55bef256879341599ddc966cac3f3e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Jewish persecution EssayFormulation Three-All maxims as proceeding from our own lawmaking ought to harmonize with a possible kingdom of ends as a kingdom of nature.Here we are told to think of ourselves as members of a society of beings whose permissible ends are to be respected. We must test our maxims by asking whether, supposing the maxims were universal laws, there would be a society of that kind. We must look at both the agent and the ricipient of the action together in a community as we legislate through our laws. Kants ethical ideas are a logical outcome of his belief in the fundamental freedom of the individual as stated in his Critique of Practical Reason (1788). This freedom he did not regard as the lawless freedom of anarchy, but rather as the freedom of self-government, the freedom to obey consciously the laws of the universe as revealed by reason. He believed that the welfare of each individual should properly be regarded as an end in itself and that the world was progressing toward an ideal society in which reason would bind every law giver to make his laws in such a way that they could have sprung from the united will of an entire people, and to regard every subject, in so far as he wishes to be a citizen, on the basis of whether he has conformed to that will. In his treatise, Perpetual Peace (1795) Kant advocated the establishment of a world federation of republican states. Kant had a greater influence than any other philosopher of modern times did. Kantian philosophy, particularly as developed by the German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel, was the basis on which the structure of Marxism was built; the dialectical method, used by both Hegel and Karl Marx, was an outgrowth of the method of reasoning by antinomies that Kant used. The German philosopher Johann Fichte, Kants pupil, rejected his teachers division of the world into objective and subjective parts and developed an idealistic philosophy that also had great influence on 19th-century socialists. One of Kants successors at the University of Knigsberg, J.F. Herbart, incorporated some of Kants ideas in his system of pedagogy.